next up previous
Next: . Up: Revisiting Woodward Hoffmann Rules Previous: .

What is the sign of the ``horizontal'' $\beta $?

We need to establish a value for $\beta^h$. Technically, $\beta^h$ corresponds to evaluating an integral (see C. W. David, J. Chem. Ed., 59, 288 (1982) and C. W. David, J. Chem. Ed., 68, 129 (1991)) such as

 \begin{displaymath}
\beta^h = \int \left ((z-R/2)e^{-\alpha r_1}\right )H
\left ( (z+R/2)e^{-\alpha r_4}\right ) d \tau
\end{displaymath} (18)

where r1 and r4 are the distances from nucleus 1 and 4 respectively to the electron, and R is the distance between the carbon atoms one and four. In a consistent coordinate system (x,y,z),

\begin{displaymath}\beta^h = \int \int \int \left ((z-R/2)e^{-\alpha \sqrt{x^2+y...
...( (z+R/2)e^{-\alpha \sqrt{x^2+y^2+(z+R/2)^2}}\right ) dx dy dz
\end{displaymath}

using the coordinate system previously defined (the relevant carbon atoms are located at (0,0,R/2) and (0,0,-R/2)). This is the reason why we chose to place Carbons 1 and 4 on the z-axis. Otherwise, we would have to have written things like

\begin{displaymath}\left ( (z+R/2)e^{-\alpha \sqrt{(x-\delta_x)^2+(y-\delta_y)^2+(z+R/2)^2}}\right )
\end{displaymath}

where $\delta_x$ and $\delta_y$ were offset coordinates for the x- and y- directions, similar to the R/2 offset term for the z- coordinates. The one-electron Hamiltonian Operator (in the same coordinate system) is

\begin{displaymath}- \frac{\hbar^2}{2m_e}\nabla^2 -
\frac{Z_1e^2}{\sqrt{x^2+y^2+(z-R/2)^2}}
-\frac{Z_4e^2}{\sqrt{x^2+y^2+(K)^2}}
\end{displaymath}


next up previous
Next: . Up: Revisiting Woodward Hoffmann Rules Previous: .
Carl David
1999-06-16